Total soluble solid and titratable acidity in different fruit maturation stages of solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom and Its mutant iaa9-3 and iaa9-5

Zulfatunnisa Zulfatunnisa; Syariful Mubarok; Kusumiyati Kusumiyati

doi:10.24198/kultivasi.v22i1.38152

Total soluble solid and titratable acidity in different fruit maturation stages of solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom and Its mutant iaa9-3 and iaa9-5

Zulfatunnisa Zulfatunnisa, Syariful Mubarok, Kusumiyati Kusumiyati

Abstract

Fruit development influences the metabolite contents and then its biological activity; however, such report is still limited in tomato IAA9 mutants. This study aims to evaluate total soluble solid and titratable acidity in several stages of fruit maturation of the mutant micro-tom tomato. The experimental method used is the t-test method with three replications and followed by correlation and principal component analysis. The tested genotype were iaa9-3 and iaa9-5 mutants against WT-MT. Pearson correlation analysis showed that iaa9-3 and iaa9-5 produced higher levels of total soluble solid and titratable acidity in different fruit maturity levels; and the increase of flowering age and all fruit maturity ages, except for the breaker age that was similar to WT-MT tomato.

Keywords

tomatoes; fruit maturity level; iaa9; fruit quality

Full Text:

PDF

References

Albert E, Segura V, Gricourt J, Bonnefoi J, Derivot L, Causse M. 2016. Association mapping reveals the genetic architecture of tomato response to water de fi cit: focus on major fruit quality traits. J. Exp. Bot., 67: 6413 – 6430. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw411

Balcerowicz M, Hoecker U. 2014. Auxin – a novel regulator of stomata differentiation. Trends in Plant Science, 19(12): 747–749. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.10.006

Campos CAB, Fernandes PD, Gheyi HR, Blanco FF, Goncalves CB, Campos SAF.2006. Yield and fruit quality of industrial tomato under saline irrigation. Sci. Agric., 2: 63-69.

Cohen JD. 1996. In vitro Tomato Fruit Cultures Demonstrate a Role for Indole-3-acetic Acid in Regulating Fruit Ripening. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 121(3): 520–524. 1996

Georgelis N. 2002. High fruit sugar characterization, inheritance and linkage of molecular markers in tomato. An M.Sc. Thesis. Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Florida University, 81 p.

Gillaspy GH, Ben-David, Gruissem W. 1993. Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell, 5: 1439–1451

Giovannoni JJ. 2021. Phytohormones in Fruit Development and Maturation. doi: 10.1111/TPJ.15112.

Gorguet B, van Heusden AW, Lindhout P. 2005. Parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato. Plant Biol 2005, 7: 131–9

Hoshikawa K, Ezura H, Fukumoto S, Ooshima S, Aiba M. 2017. Heat tolerant tomato mutant and method for producing the same. Patent Application Publication, 1: 1–59

Kim JS, Ezura K, Lee J, Kojima M, Takebayashi Y, Sakakibara H, Ariizumi T, Ezura H. 2020. The inhibition of SlIAA9 mimics an increase in endogenous auxin and mediates changes in auxin and gibberellin signalling during parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato. Journal of Plant Physiology, 252: 153238.

Kumar R, Khurana A, Sharma AK. 2014. Role of plant hormones and their interplay in development and ripening of fleshy fruits. J Exp Bot., 65: 4561–4575.

Majidi H, Minaei S, Almasi M, Mostofi Y. 2011. Total soluble solids, titratable acidity and repining index of tomato in various storage conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5 (12): 1723-1726.

Marti R, Rosello S, Cebolla-Cornejo J. 2016. Tomato as a source of carotenoids and polyphenols targeted to cancer prevention. Cancers (Basel), 8: E58. doi: 10.3390/cancers8060058

Matsuo S, Miyatake K, Endo M, Urashimo S, Kawanishi T, Negoro S, Shimakoshi S, Fukuoka H. 2020. Loss of function of the Pad-1 aminotransferase gene, which is involved in auxin homeostasis, induces parthenocarpy in Solanaceae plants. PNAS Latest Articles. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2001211117

Mohammed M, Wilson LA, Gomes PL. 1999. Postharvest sensory and physiochemical attributes of processing and non-processing tomato cultivar. Journal of Food Quality, 22: 167–182.

Molesini B, Dusi V, Pennisi F, Pandolfini T. 2020. How Hormones and MADS-Box Transcription Factors Are Involved in Controlling Fruit Set and Parthenocarpy in Tomato. Genes 2020, 11, 1441; doi:10.3390/genes11121441

Mubarok S, Ezura H, Qonit MAH, Prayudha E, Anas, Suwali N, Kusumiyati, Kurnia D. 2019. Alteration of nutritional and antioxidant level of ethylene receptor tomato mutants, Sletr1-1 and Sletr1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108546

Mubarok, S, Farhah, FF, Anas, Suwali N, Kurnia D, Kusumiyati, Suminar E, Ezura H. 2019. Data on the yield and quality of organically hybrids of tropical tomato fruits at two stages of fruit maturation. Data in Brief, 25, 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104031

Mubarok S. 2020. Data Pribadi. Universitas Padjadjaran

Pan Z, Li Y, Deng X, Xiao S. 2013. Non-targeted metabolomic analysis of orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) wild type and bud mutant fruits by direct analysis in real-time and HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry. Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013. DOI 10.1007/s11306-013-0597-7

Pattison RJ, Catala C. 2012. Evaluating auxin distribution in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) through an analysis of the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families. Plant J., 70: 585–598

Pattison RJ, Csukasi F, Zheng Y, Fei Z, Van Der Knaap E, Catala C. 2015.Comprehensive tissue specific transcriptome analysis reveals distinct regulatory programs during early tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol., 168: 1684–1701. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00287

Quinet M, Angosto T, Lisbona FJY, Gros RB, Bigot S, Martinez JP, Lutts S. 2019. Tomato Fruit Development and Metabolism. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1554.

Roitsch T, Balibrea ME, Hofmann M, Proels R, Sinha AK. 2003. Extracellular invertase: key metabolic protein and PR protein. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54: 513–524.

Roitsch T, Ehneß R, Goetz M, Hause B, Hofmann M, Sinha AK. 2000. Regulation and function of extracellular invertase from higher plants in relation to assimilate partitioning, stress responses and sugar signalling. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27: 815–825.

Sachs T. 2005. Auxin’s role as an example of the mechanisms of shoot/root relations. Plant and Soil, 268: 13–19.

Saito T, Ariizumi T, Okabe Y, Asamizu E, Hiwasa Tanase K, Fukuda N, Mizoguchi T, Yamazaki Y, Aoki K, Ezura H. 2011. Tomatoma: A Novel Tomato Mutant DAPabase Distributing Micro-Tom Mutant Collections. Plant Cell Physiol., 52(2): 283–296.

Serrani JC, Ruiz-Rivero, Fos M, García-Martínez. 2008. Auxin-induced fruit-set in tomato is mediated in part by gibberellins. Plant J., 56: 922–934

Shani E, Salehin M, Zhang Y, Kay SA, Paz JP, Estelle M. 2017. Plant Stress Tolerance Requires Auxin-Sensitive Aux/IAA Transcriptional Repressors. Current Biology 27, 437–444.

Teale WD, Ditengou FA, Dovzhenko AD, Li X, Molendijk AM, Ruperti B, Paponov I, Palme K. 2008. Auxin as a model for the integration of hormonal signal processing and transduction. Molecular Plant, 1: 229–237

Tilahun, AT. 2013. Analysis of the effect of maturity stage on the postharvest biochemical quality characteristics of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Fruit. Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci, 3(5): 180-186

Wang K, Tang D, Wang M, Lu J, Yu H, Liu J, Qian B, Gong Z, Wang X, Chen J, Gu M, Cheng Z. 2009. MER3 is required for normal meiotic crossover formation, but not for presynaptic alignment in rice. J Cell Sci 122 (Pt 12): 2055-63

Wu M, Kubota C. 2008. Effects of high electrical conductivity of nutrient solution and its application timing on lycopene, chlorophyll and sugar concentrations of hydroponic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/kultivasi.v22i1.38152