A review of low-frequency latex harvesting systems that lessen the tapper shortage problem of the smallholders' natural rubber production

Zar Ni Zaw

Abstract


Smallholders' rubber production is encountering problems of skilled tapper shortage and high production costs resulting from increased worker wages and the substantial growth of new mature areas. Low-frequency latex harvesting system (LFLHS) effectively improves tapper productivity with long-term optimum yield by reducing the tapper requirement. LFLHS reduces tapper requirement by 33% to 67% of the conventional harvesting systems. Under the d3 (tapping every three days) frequency harvesting system, a tapper is assigned to cover three tasks, and his productivity is at least 30% higher than that of the d2 (alternative daily) frequency harvesting system. The cumulative yield of LFLHS is comparable to that of d2 frequency. It is economically profitable when the cumulative yield of LFLHS reaches 90% of the d2 frequency tapping as a break-even yield. Its low number of tapper requirement and high productivity saves tapping cost. 20% to 55% of tapping cost can be reduced by shifting the harvesting frequency from d2 to d3. The virgin bark of basal panels could be tapped at least four to ten years more than conventional tapping systems. The low bark consumption allows sufficient time for the regeneration of bark tissues resulting in a potentially higher yield from the renewed bark. Thus, sustainable economic yield is achievable for a productive lifespan of 30 to 35 years from the LFLHS. These advantages of LFLHS contribute to reducing the tapper requirement and cost of production, ensuring increased profits and a longer economic lifespan of rubber production.

Keywords: Latex harvesting system, Tapper requirement, Tapper productivity, Tapping cost


Keywords


Latex harvesting system; Tapper requirement; Tapper productivity; Tapping cost

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali MF, Abdul Aziz A, Williams A. 2020. Assessing Yield and Yield Stability of Hevea Clones in the Southern and Central Regions of Malaysia. Agronomy, 10(5): 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050643

An F, Lin W, Cahill D, Rookes J, Kong L. 2014. Variation of phloem turgor pressure in Hevea brasiliensis: an implication for latex yield and tapping system optimization. Industrial Crops and Products, 58: 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.016

Association of Natural Rubber Producing Countries. 2021. Natural Rubber Statistics March 2021. ANRPC.

Bottier C. 2020. Biochemical composition of Hevea brasiliensis latex: A focus on the protein, lipid, carbohydrate and mineral contents. Advances in Botanical Research, 93: 201-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2019.11.003

Chantuma P, Lacote R, Leconte A, Gohet E. 2011. An innovative tapping system, the double cut alternative, to improve the yield of Hevea brasiliensis in Thai rubber plantations. Field Crops Research, 121(3): 416-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.013

Chantuma P, Lacote R, Gohet E. 2022. Low frequency to increase productivity in Thailand. Proceedings of International Rubber Conference 2019. Naypyitaw. International Rubber Research Development and Board. Malaysia. p. 112-130 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368247342_IRC2019_Proceedings

Chao J, Chen Y, Wu S, Tian WM. 2015. Comparative transcriptome analysis of latex from rubber tree clone CATAS8-79 and PR107 reveals new cues for the regulation of latex regeneration and duration of latex flow. BMC Plant Biology, 15:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0488-3

Fox J, Castella C. 2013. Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in mainland Southeast Asia: What are the prospects of small holders? Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(1): 155-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.750605

Gomez JB, Hamzah S. 1989. Frey-Wyssling complex in Hevea latex uniqueness of the organelle. Journal of Natural Rubber Research, 4(2): 75-85.

Jacob JL, Prervot JC, Roussel D, Lacrottle R, Serres E, d’Auzac J, Eschbach JM, Omont H. 1989. Yield-limiting factors, latex physiological parameters, latex diagnosis and clonal typology. Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex. (eds. J d’Auzac, JL Jacob, H Chrestin). CRC Press, Florida. p. 345-382

Karunaichamy K, Thomas KU, Rajagopal R. 2012. Yield performance of clone RRII 105 under low frequency tapping in BO-2 and in BI-1 panels. Journal of Rubber Research, 25(1): 52-60

Kewi C, Sivakumaran S. 1994. Performance of low frequency tapping systems. Proceedings of Workshop on exploitation technologies to address current labour problems in the rubber industry, 5-6 December 1994. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia. Malaysia. p. 47-67

Lacote R, Doumbia A, Obouayeba S, Gohet E. 2013. Sustainable rubber production through good latex harvesting practices: stimulation based on clonal latex functional typology and tapping panel management. Proceedings of IRRDB Workshop on Latex Harvesting Technology. Rubber Research Institute of Vietnam. Vietnam. p.1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4623.3126

Lacote R, Obouyeba S, Clement-Demange A, Dian K, Gnagne M, Gohet E. 2004. Panel management in Rubber (Hevea brasilinesis) tapping and impact on yield, growth and latex diagnosis. Journal of Rubber Research, 7(3): 199-217

Leilani AC, Myranel SC, Nicasio MG, Arturo SAC, Rolly VB, Analyn CM, Emer CG, Aldin CA, Nick MM, Nathaniel CB. 2015. Assessment of rubber latex production based on diameter class and frequency of tapping and collection for sustainable latex production and management in the Philippines. Proceedings of International Rubber Conference 2015. International Rubber Research and Development Board. Vietnam. p. 357-364

Malaysian Rubber Board. 2019. Latex harvesting. Rubber plantation and processing technology. Malaysian Rubber Board. Malaysia. p. 247-314

Nayagam J, Abraham PD, Yong HW. 1986. Economic returns of selected stimulated tapping systems. Proceedings of International Rubber Conference 1985. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia. Malaysia. p: 527-540.

Njukeng JN, Muenyi PM, Ngane BK, Ehabe EE. 2011. Ethephon stimulation and yield response of some Hevea clones in the humid forests of South West Cameroon. International Journal of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/257340

Nugawela A, Peries MRC, Wijesekera S, Samarasekera RL. 2000. Evaluation of d/3 tapping with stimulation to alleviate problems related to d/2 tapping of Hevea. Journal of Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka. 83: 49-61.

Obouayeba S, Soumahin EF, Dobo M, Lacote R, Gabla O, Doumbia A. 2009. Agronomic performance of the clone IRCA 111 of Hevea brasiliensis under different frequencies of tapping and stimulation in South-West Côte d'Ivoire. Journal of Rubber Research, 12 (2): 93-102. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/549905/

Obouayeba S, Soumahin EF, Coulibaly LF. 2010. Low intensity tapping systems applied to clone PR 107 of Hevea brasiliensis (Muell. Arg.) in South-eastern Cote d’Ivoire: Influence of the nature of the exploited bark and the position of tapping panel. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(5): 1106-1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2010.1.5.1106.1118

Ra HR. 2014. Minimum wage levels across Southeast Asia: Trends and issues. International Area Studies Review, 17(3): 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865914546501

Rodrigo VHL. 2007. Adoption of different tapping systems in the rubber industry of Sri Lanka with special reference to low frequency tapping. Journal of Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, 88: 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/jrrisl.v88i0.1814

Rodrigo VHL, Kudaligama KVVS, Fernando KMEP, Yapa PAJ. 2011. Harvesting the rubber tree once in four days: a solution to current issues in the rubber industry in Sri Lanka. Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, 91: 15-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/jrrisl.v91i0.1850

Rodrigo VHL, Kudaligama KVVS, Fernondo KMEP, Yapa PAJ. 2012. Replacing traditional half spiral cut by a quarter cut with ethephon; a simple approach to solve current issues related to latex harvesting in rubber industry. Journal of National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 40(4): 283-291. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v40i4.5042

Sainoi T, Sdoodee S, Lacote R, Gohet, E. 2017a. Low frequency tapping systems applied to young-tapped trees of Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) Müll. Arg. in Southern Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 51(4): 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2017.03.001

Sainoi T, Sdoodee S, Lacote R, Gohet E, Chantuma P. 2017b. Stimulation affecting latex physiology and yield under low frequency tapping of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) clone RRIM 600 in southern Thailand. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 11(2):220-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.17.11.02.p305

Shi MJ, Cai FG, Tian WM. 2016. Ethrel-stimulated prolongation of latex flow in the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.): an Hev b 7-like protein acts as a universal antagonist of rubber particle aggregating factors from lutoids and C-serum. Journal of Biochemistry, 159(2): 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvv095

Silpi U, Lacointe A, Kasempsap P, Thanysawanyangkura S, Chantuma P, Gohet E, Musigamart N, Clement A, Ameglio T, Thaler P. 2007. Carbohydrate reserves as a competing sink: evidence from tapping rubber trees. Tree Physiology, 27(6): 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.6.881

Sivakumaran S. 2002. Exploitation systems to maximize yield productivity and enhance profitability in rubber. Proceedings of Global competitiveness of India rubber planting industry. Rubber Planter’s Conference 2002. Rubber Research Institute of India. India. p. 163-174

Soumahin EF, Obouateba S, Dick KE, Dogbo DO, Anno AP. 2010. Low intensity tapping systems applied to clone PR 107 of Hevea brasiliensis (Muell. Arg.): results of 21 years of exploitation in south-eastern Cote d'Ivoire. African Journal of Plant Science, 4(5): 145-153

Thanh DK, Sivakumaran S, Choo AW. 1996. Long-term effect of tapping and stimulation frequency on yield performance of rubber clone GT 1. Journal of Natural Rubber Research, 11(2): 96-107

Traore MS, Diarrassouba M, Okoma KM, Dick KE, Soumahin EF, Coulibaly LF, Obouayeba S. 2011. Long-term effect of different annual frequencies of ethylene stimulation on rubber productivity of clone GT1 of Hevea brasiliensis (Muell. Arg.) in south east of Cote d'Ivoire. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 2: 1251-1260. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2011.2.8.1251.1260

Vijayakumar KR, Thomas KU, Rajagopal R. 2000. Tapping. Natural Rubber Agromanagement and Crop Processing. (eds. PJ George, C Kuruvilla Jacob). Rubber Research Institute of India. India. p. 215-238

Vijayakumar KR, Thomas KU, Rajagopal R. Karunaichamy K. 2003. Response of Hevea clones to low frequency tapping. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Exploitation Technology, 2003. Rubber Research Institute of India. India. p. 17-42

Yeang HY. 2005. The Kinetics of Latex Flow from the Rubber Tree in Relation to Latex Vessel Plugging and Turgor Pressure. Journal of Rubber Research, 8(3): 160-181

Zaw ZN, Sdoodee S, Lacote R. 2017. Performances of low frequency rubber tapping system with rainguard in high rainfall area in Myanmar. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 11(11): 1451-1456. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.17.11.11.pne593

Zhu J, Zhang Z. 2009. Ethylene stimulation of latex production in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 4(11): 1072-1074. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.11.9738




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/kultivasi.v22i2.48317

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kultivasi Indexed by:

       width=    

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View Jurnal Kultivasi Stat