Penetration capability of three different light curing units to composite-resin as measured by radiometer

Henri Hartman

Abstract


Introduction: Composite-resin is widely used as a restorative material in dental practice on a daily basis when it comes to an aesthetic consideration. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the light penetration capabilities of three light curing units (LCU) through layers of composite resin using a radiometer.  Method: Composites resin discs (2mm thick with 8 mm diameter) were cured out of seven different shades. Each specimen were used as a barrier, and a light source from three different LCUS was then applied through it. The radiometer was used to record the intensities of each LCU. Result: LED.C (Woodpecker™) has the lowest penetration capabilities to pass through the barrier compared to all LCU. The output intensity (mW/cm2) of all LCU has decreased gradually. ANOVA test showed that there was the significant result (p<0.01) for each specimen. Conclusion: The differences composite-resin shade could decrease the penetration capability of LCU.


Keywords


Composite-resin, Light Curing Unit, light intensity radiometer.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Committee, O. & Council, R. Guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatr. Dent. 34, 173–80 (2012).

Zoergiebel, J. & Ilie, N. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: Effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clin. Oral Investig. 17, 619–626 (2012).

Yaman, B. C. et al. The effects of halogen and light-emitting diode light curing on the depth of cure and surface microhardness of composite resins. J. Conserv. Dent. 14, 136–139 (2011).

Micali, B. & Basting, R. T. Effectiveness of composite resin polymerization using light-emitting diodes ( LEDs ) or halogen-based light-curing units Efetividade de polimerização de uma resina composta fotopolimerizada por diodos emissores de luz ( LEDs ) ou luz. 18, (2004).

Kamal Nabhi, Ajay Chhabra, Varun Jindal, D. To Determinde the functional efficacy of LED units in various clinical offices. Dent. J. Adv. Stud. 3, 34–38 (2015).

Giorgi, M. C. C. & Paulillo, L. A. M. S. Knoop hardness of composites cured with halogen and led light-curing units in class I restorations. Brazilian J. Oral Sci. 8, 30–33 (2009).

Vivek Hegde, S. J. & Aher, G. B. A clinical survey of the output intensity of 200 light curing units in dental offices across Maharashtra. J. Conserv. Dent. 12, 105–108 (2009).

El-Mowafy, O., El-Badrawy, W., Wasef, M., Omar, H. & Kermanshahi, S. Efficacy of new LED light-curing units in hardening of Class II composite restorations. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. (Tor). 73, 253a–253e (2007).

Burgess, J. O., Walker, R. & Davidson, J. M. Posterior resin-based composite : review of the literature. Pediatr. Dent. 24, 465–479 (2002).

Shortall, A., El-Mahy, W., Stewardson, D., Addison, O. & Palin, W. Initial fracture resistance and curing temperature rise of ten contemporary resin-based composites with increasing radiant exposure. J. Dent. 41, 455–63 (2013).

Mahn, E. Clinical criteria for the successful curing of composite materials. Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implant. Rehabil. Oral Vol. 6, 148–153 (2013).

Randolph, L. D. et al. Ultra-fast light-curing resin composite with increased conversion and reduced monomer elution. Dent. Mater. 30, 594–604 (2014).

Vijaya Kumar, C. N., Gururaj, M., Paul, J., Krishnaprasada, L. & Divyashree, R. A comparative evaluation of curing depth and compressive strength of dental composite cured with halogen light curing unit and blue light emitting diode: An in vitro study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 13, 834–837 (2012).

Marovic, D. et al. Time Dependent Accuracy of Dental Radiometers. Acta Clin. Croat. 52, 173–180 (2013).

Federlin, M. & Price, R. Improving light-curing instruction in dental school. J. Dent. Educ. 77, 764–72 (2013).

Price, R. B., Labrie, D., Whalen, J. M. & Felix, C. M. Effect of distance on irradiance and beam homogeneity from 4 light-emitting diode curing units. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. (Tor). 77, b9 (2011).

Jadhav, S., Aher, G., Hegde, V. & Fajandar, N. Influence of light curing units on failure of directcomposite restorations. J. Conserv. Dent. 14, 225 (2011).

Thomé, T., Steagall, W., Tachibana, A., Braga, S. R. M. & Turbino, M. L. Influence of the Distance of the Curing Light Source and Composite Shade on Hardness of Two Composites. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 15, 486–91 (2007).

Mohammed, A. & Ario, S. Resin-Based Composite and LCU-related Factors Affecting the Degree of Cure. A Literature Review: Part 2. Light Curing Units & Related Factors. Acta Medica Marisiensis 61, 255–260 (2015).

Hervás-García, A., Martínez-Lozano, M. A., Cabanes-Vila, J., Barjau-Escribano, A. & Fos-Galve, P. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med. oral, Patol. oral y cirugía bucal. 11, 215–220 (2006).

Lima, A. F. et al. Influence of light source and extended time of curing on microhardness and degree of conversion of different regions of a nanofilled composite resin. Eur. J. Dent. 6, 153–157 (2012).

Ceballos, L. et al. Curing effectiveness of resin composites at different exposure times using LED and halogen units. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 14, 3–8 (2009).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol30no2.18326

Article metrics

Abstract views : 0 | views : 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Visitor Stat

Creative Commons License
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License