E-portfolio system development for undergraduate clinical dentistry: An action research study

Nadia Greviana, Rita Mustika, Diantha Soemantri

Abstract


Introduction: Higher education institutions are responsible for accommodating students to synthesise the knowledge and skills they obtained in the classroom or workplace through reflections. In the field of health professional education, the use of e-portfolio has provided an empirically validated conceptual model of integrated knowledge and learning. Therefore, it is essential to analyse the need to establish a new platform to engage stakeholders and thus ensure daily use of e-portfolio by students in undergraduate dentistry program in Indonesia. The present study was aimed to develop an e-portfolio platform based on a needs analysis and explore stakeholders’ perceptions following its implementation. Methods: The present study was a participatory action research study using a cross-sectional design with a qualitative approach that involved trainees and supervisors in an undergraduate clinical dentistry program. The study was divided into three stages: the exploration stage, the pilot study stage, and the evaluation stage of the e-portfolio platform. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders, which included faculty members and students. Data were analysed thematically. Results: The e-portfolio platform was developed according to the results of the needs analysis stage while considering stakeholders’ expectations and expected features. The results of the evaluation stage indicated a positive response from respondents. Respondents considered the e-portfolio to be very useful in students’ professional development, as it helped students to understand the content, assisted in learning, and improved their understanding of self-reflection. Conclusion: Performing a needs analysis prior to the development of an e-portfolio system provided information on technical issues regarding its development as well as the adequate supporting system required prior to its implementation. Although the implementation of the e-portfolio developed in this early stage was not conducted ideally, students reported a satisfactory impact on their learning.


Keywords


E-portfolio; needs analysis; undergraduate clinical dentistry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ameyaw J, Turnhout E, Arts B, Wals A. Creating a responsive curriculum for postgraduates: lessons from a case in Ghana. J Further Higher Educ. 2019; 43(4): 573-88. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1386285

Peet M, Lonn S, Gurin P, Boyer KP, Matney M, Marra T, et al. Fostering integrative knowledge. Int J ePortfolio. 2011; 1(1): 11-31.

Driessen E, van Tartwijk J. Portfolio on Personal and Professional Development. In: Swanwick T. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014: pp. 193-200.

Koole S, Vanobbergen J, De Visschere L, Aper L, Dornan T, Derese A. The influence of reflection on portfolio learning in undergraduate dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013; 17(1): e93-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00766.x

Tonni I, Mora L, Oliver RG. Postgraduate orthodontics students’ and mentors’ perceptions of portfolios and discussion as tools for development of reflection. J Dent Educ. 2016; 80(9): 1098-108. DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.9.tb06192.x

Gadbury-Amyot GC, McCracken MS, Woldt JL, Brennan R. Implementation of portfolio assessment of student competence in two dental school populations. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76(12): 1559-71. DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.12.tb05419.x

van der Schaaf M, Donkers J, Slof B, Moonen-van Loon J, van Tartwijk J, Driessen E, et al. Improving workplace-based assessment and feedback by an E-portfolio enhanced with learning analytics. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2017; 65: 359-80. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9496-8

Donath C, Luttenberger K, Gräßel E, Simon C. Portfolios to train interactions between patients and doctors-to-be: Making it work. Br J Educ Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 4(3): 272–308. DOI: 10.9734/BJESBS/2014/6789

Harden RM. Curriculum Planning and Development. In: Dent JH, Harden RM. A Practical Guide for Medical Teacher. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2013. pp. 8-15.

Moores A, Parks M. Twelve tips for introducing E-portfolios with undergraduate students. Med Teach. 2010; 32(1): 46-9. DOI: 10.3109/01421590903434151

Heeneman S, Driessen EW. The use of a portfolio in postgraduate medical education – reflect, assess and account, one for each or all in one?. GMS J Med Educ. 2017; 34(5): Doc57. DOI: 10.3205/zma001134

Tonni I, Oliver RG. Acceptability of a reflective e-portfolio instituted in an orthodontic specialist programme: A pilot study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013; 17(3): 177-84. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12038

White GW, Suchowierska M, Campbell M. Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(4 Suppl 2): S3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.109

Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2007.

Vernazza C, Durham J, Ellis J, Teasdale D, Cotterill S, Scott L, et al. Introduction of an e-portfolio in clinical dentistry: Staff and student view. Eur J Dent Educ. 2011; 15(1): 36-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00631.x

Crommelinck M, Anseel F. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: A literature review. Med Educ. 2013; 47(3): 232-41. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12075

Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Wass V. Portofolios in medical education: Why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41(12): 1224–33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02944.x

Tummons J. ‘It sorts of feels uncomfortable’: Problematising the assessment of reflective practice. Stud Higher Educ. 2011; 36(4): 471-83. DOI: 10.1080/03075071003671794

Greviana N, Mustika R, Soemantri D. Development of e-portfolio in undergraduate clinical dentistry: How trainees select and reflect on evidence. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020; 24(2): 320-7. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12502

Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(4): 387-96.

Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, And Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. California: Sage; 2001.

Oktaria D, Soemantri D. Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions on feedback-seeking behaviour. Malays J Med Sci. 2018; 25(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.1.9

Indonesia Medical Council. Competency Standards for Indonesian Dentists. Jakarta: Indonesia Medical Council; 2015.

Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan KS, Zamora J, Malick S, et al. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. Med Teach. 2009; 31(4): 282-98. DOI; 10.1080/01421590902889897



Digital Object Identifier

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol32no2.25055


Dimension Citation Metrics Badge

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


     

      

    

Visitor Stat

Creative Commons License
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License