Tingkat kesesuaian pembacaan struktur normal maksila pada radiografi panoramik: Studi Observasional
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: Radiografi panoramik merupakan salah satu radiograf yang banyak digunakan pada praktek kedokteran gigi. Radiografi panoramik menampilkan struktur anatomi yang kompleks sehingga memiliki tantangan tersendiri dalam menginterpretasi khususnya pada gambaran radiografi maksila. Interpretasi atau pembacaan struktur anatomi normal pada radiografi sangat penting dalam ketepatan diagnosis penyakit. Struktur anatomi daerah maksila dekat dengan ruang fasial memiliki kompleksitas tersendiri secara deskriptif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian pembacaan struktur normal maksila pada radiografi panoramik. Metode: Penelitian observasional deskriptif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional ini melibatkan 77 mahasiswa profesi semester 3 dan 27 mahasiswa profesi semester 4 Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Jember. Penelitian dilakukan dengan cara menyebar kuesioner terbuka berupa sebuah radiograf panoramik berisikan struktur normal rongga mulut disertai tanda panah dan nomor pada struktur yang ditentukan untuk disebutkani jawaban yang benar. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil: Kesesuaian pembacaan pada struktur sinus maksila sangat baik sebesar 100%. Kesesuaian pada struktur maksila lainnya dikatakan baik dengan persentase palatum sebesar 80%, cavum nasi sebesar 84%, spina nasalis anterior sebesar 84%, foramen insisif sebesar 82%, dan septum nasal sebesar 83%. Simpulan: Tingkat kesesuaian pembacaan struktur maksila yang paling tinggi ialah sinus maksila dan yang terendah ialah palatum. Struktur yang memiliki variasi jawaban tertinggi adalah foramen insisif dan cavum nasi.
Kata kunci
interpretasi, rongga mulut, maksila, radiografi panoramik
Conformity level of maxillary normal structure reading on panoramic radiographs: Observational study
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Panoramic radiography is a widely utilized imaging technique in dental practice. It presents a comprehensive view of complex anatomical structures, which presents challenges in interpretation, particularly in the context of maxillary radiographic images. Accurately interpreting typical anatomical structures on radiographs is crucial for precise disease diagnosis. The intricate anatomical features in the maxillary region adjacent to the facial space add to the complexity of the description. This study assesses the accuracy of interpreting typical maxillary anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs. Methods: This descriptive observational study employed a cross-sectional approach. It included 77 third-semester professional students and 27 fourth-semester professional students from the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Jember. The study involved the distribution of open-ended questionnaires, presenting panoramic radiographs depicting typical oral cavity structures, each marked with arrows and corresponding numbers. The obtained data were subject to descriptive analysis. Results: The accuracy of interpreting maxillary sinus structures was excellent at 100%. The interpretation accuracy of other maxillary structures was rated as good, with percentages as follows: palate 80%, nasal cavity 84%, anterior nasal spine 84%, incisive foramen 82%, and nasal septum 83%. In conclusion, the reading accuracy was highest for maxillary sinus structures and lowest for the palate. The incisive foramen and cavum nasi displayed the highest variation in answers among the structures.
Keywords
reading, oral cavity, maxilla, panoramic radiography
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Onder O, Yarasir Y, Azizova A, Durhan G, Onur MR, Ariyurek OM. Errors, discrepancies and underlying bias in radiology with case examples: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2021; 12(1): 51 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-00986-8
Román JCM, Fretes VR, Adorno CG, Silva RG, Noguera JLV, Legal-Ayala H, et al. Panoramic dental radiography image enhancement using multiscale mathematical morphology. Sensors. 2021; 21(9): 3110. DOI: 10.3390/s21093110
Arslan ZB, Demir H, Yıldız DB, Yaşar F. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography and ultrasonography in detecting periapical lesions using periapical radiography as a gold standard. Dentomax Rad. 2020; 49(6): 20190290. DOI: 10.1259/DMFR.20190290
Gross H, Nilsson M, Hellén-Halme K. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs. Swedish Dent J. 2014; 38(4): 179–85.
Widyaningrum R, Faisal A, Mitrayana M, Mudjosemedi M, Agustina D. Oral cancer imaging: the principles of interpretation on dental radiograph, CT, CBCT, MRI, and USG. Maj Kedok Gi Indo. 2018; 4(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.22146/majkedgiind.22050
Rahayu S. Odontektomi, Tatalaksana Gigi Bungsu Impaksi. E-J WIDYA Kes Lingk. 2014; 1(2): 81–9.
Ilguy D, Ilguy M, Dolekoglu ZS, Ersan N, Fisekcioglu E. Evaluation of radiological anatomy knowledge among dental students. Yeditepe Dent J. 2017; 13(3):31-6. DOI: 10.5505/yeditepe.2017.49140
Carter LC. Soft tissue calcifications and ossifications. Oral Radiology. 2014. p. 524–41. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2019.0100
Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. 6th Ed. London: Elsevier. ; 2021. p. 1–1185.
Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015; 35(6): 1668–76. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150023
Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D. Interpretive error in radiology. Am J Roentgen. 2017; 208(4): 739–49.DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16963
Commission on Dental Accreditation. Accreditation Standards for Dental Education Programs. Chicago; IL. 2021. p.60611-2678
Dasuki. Kompetensi tambahan dokter gigi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. J Huk Etika Kes. 2021; 1(2): 145-58.DOI: 10.30649/jhek.v1i2.21
Mallaya S, Lam E. White and Pharoah’s Oral Radiology E-Book: Principles and Interpretation. 8th ed. St.Louis Missouri: Elsevier; 2019. p. 137–187.
Sangi SH, Shinta AP, dan Sekar P. Perbedaan pengetahuan struktur anatomi normal radiograf panoramik antara mahasiswa preklinik dan klinik. Sriwijaya University Institutional Repository. 2022; 7(1): 73-80.
Wahyudi T S. Statistika Ekonomi : Konsep, Teori, dan Penerapan. Malang : UB Press; 2017.
Firmansyah D, Dede. Teknik pengambilan sampel umum dalam metodologi penelitian: Literature review. J Ilm Pendid Holis. 2022; 1(2): 85-114.DOI: 10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937
Tobing J. Rinitis Akibat Kerja. Jurnal IKRAITH-HUMANIORA. 2022; 6(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-humaniora.v6i1
Boel, T. Dental Radiografi Prinsip Dan Teknik. Edisi Revisi. Medan : USU Press.; 2019. p. 96-101
Maeda N, Hosoki H, Yoshida M, Suito H, Honda E. Dental students' levels of understanding normal panoramic anatomy. J Dent Sci. 2018 Dec;13(4):374-377. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jds.2018.08.002
Karjodkar FR. Essential of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology. 2st Ed. London : Jaype Brothers Medical Publisher ; 2014. p.201
Alsufyani N, Sarah A, Sarah M, Raseel A, Mayson A, Areej B, Maram A, Abdulrahman A, Meshari A, Asma'a F. Virtual reality simulation of panoramic radiographic anatomy for dental students. J Dent Educ.2023;87:1200–1209 https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13240
Ongole R, Praveen BN. Textbook of Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis dan Oral Radiology. 2nd Ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2018. p. 198-456
Annisa A, Arni I D. Manajemen Black Triangle dalam Kedokteran Gigi Estetik : Literature Review. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Univeriras Baiturrahmah. Spesial Edition. 2018; 8(2) : 193-201. https://doi.org/10.33854/jbd.v8i2.888
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v35i2.47848
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran
INDEXING & PARTNERSHIP
Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License