Effect of storage temperature and material shelf life on provisional crown’s hardness and flexural strength: an experimental laboratory study
Abstract
Pengaruh temperatur dan masa penyimpanan terhadap kekerasan permukaan dan kekuatan fleksural bahan mahkota sementara: studi eksperimental laboratoris
Pendahuluan: Mahkota sementara merupakan restorasi sementara yang dipasang pada gigi yang telah dipreparasi sampai mahkota definitif selesai. Mahkota dan jembatan sementara sering terjadi retakan karena sifat mekanik material yang tidak adekuat. Penelitian dilakukan untuk menganalisis pengaruh temperatur penyimpanan dan masa penyimpanan bahan terhadap kekerasan permukaan dan kekuatan fleksural bahan mahkota sementara bis-acryl. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah studi eksperimental laboratoris dengan desain posttest only control design. Lima katrid bahan restorasi sementara bis-acryl (SmarTemp®, shade A2, USA) dibagi menjadi 2 kelompok. Tiga puluh lima sampel berbentuk silindris (10 x 2 mm) dan 35 sampel berbentuk balok (2x2x25 mm) dibuat dengan cara memasukan bahan bis-acryl ke dalam cetakan aluminium. Kekerasan permukaan diukur menggunakan Vickers Hardness Tester (Shimadzu HMV®, Jepang) dan kekuatan fleksural diuji menggunakan uji three-point bending (Tensilon AND RTF-1350®, Jepang). Hasil dianalisis menggunakan uji ANOVA satu arah yang dilanjutkan dengan uji LSD post-hoc. Hasil: Nilai rata-rata tertinggi kekerasan permukaan yaitu 31.20±0.91 dan kekuatan fleksural yaitu 62.32±0.75. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan pada kekerasan permukaan (p=0,001) dan kekuatan fleksural (p=0,0001). Simpulan: Kekerasan permukaan dan kekuatan fleksural dipengaruhi oleh temperatur dan masa penyimpanan produk. Bis-acryl yang baru diproduksi dan 12 bulan sebelum kadaluarsa disarankan disimpan pada suhu 5 oC atau temperatur ruangan (27 oC) karena memiliki kekerasan permukaan dan kekuatan fleksural yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan bahan yang disimpan pada temperatur 35oC.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujitomo J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics 5 th ed., St.Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2016. p. 467-75.
Binalrimal SR, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Jin Q. Flexural strength evaluation of immediate and aged repair of provisional restorative materials. J Dent Oral Health. 2018;1(1):1–7.
Digholkar D, Madhav NV, Palaskar J. Evaluation of the flexural strength and microhardness of provisional crown and bridge materials fabricated by different methods. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16:328-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.191288
Rubio DA, Gaete AD, Arcis CB, Company JMM, Moscardo AP, Silla JMA. Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193162
El Najjar G, Halal R, Daou M, Zebouni E. In vitro evaluation of the flexural strength of different temporary crown materials, after thermocycling. Acta Sci Dent Scienecs. 2021;5(9):121–34. https://doi.org/10.31080/ASDS.2021.05.1197
Jasim AH, Alwan LE, Abood AZ. Comparison of fracture resistance of cad/cam interim bridge and conventional interim resin bridge. World J Ph armaceutical Res. 2019;8(5): 262-275. https://doi.org/10.20959/wjpr20195-14612
Alduroj V, Chaijareenont P, Yavirach A, Angkasith P. Semi-permanent restorations just temporary or long-lasting use?: a review of the literature. CM Dent J. 2023;44(1):13-21. https://doi.org/10.12982/CMDENTJ.2023.001
Katayama Y, Ohashi K, Iwasaki T, Kameyama Y, Wada Y, Miyake K, et al. A study on the characteristics of resin composites for provisional restorations. Dent Mater J. 2022;41(2):256–65. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-006
Niem T, Heun U, Hübner A, Wöstmann B. Effect of cartridge storage time and ambient laboratory conditions on the stability of mechanical properties of bis-acryl interim resin materials. J Prosthodont. 2021;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13338
Calligaris S, Manzocco L, Anese M, Nicoli MC. Accelerated shelf life testing. Food Quality and Shelf Life. Elsevier Inc.; 2019. p. 359–92.
Puspitasari D, Prasetyo A, Rahman MD, Diana S, Nahzi MYI. Storage temperature effect on degree of polymerization and surface hardness of bulk-fill composite resin. J Int Dent Med Res. 2019;12(2):405-10.
Wajong KH, Damiyanti M, Irawan B. The Effect of shelf life on the compressive strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement. J Physics. 2017:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/884/1/012101
He Y, Li H, Xiao X, Zhao X. Polymer degradation: category, mechanism and development prospect. E3S Web Conf 2021;290: 01012.
Maksoud OA, Hamama HH, Wafaie RA, Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH. Effect of shelf-storage temperature on degree of conversion and microhardness of composite restorative materials. BMC oral health. 2023;23(57):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02770-0
Sabbagh J, Nabbout F, Jabbour E, Leloup G. The effect of expiration date on mechanical properties of resin composites. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018;8(2):99–103.https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_445_17
Sharafeddin F, Motamedi M, Fattah Z. Effect of preheating and precooling on the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of nanohybrid and silorane-based composite. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2015;16(3):224-29.
Parkell. “SmarTemp Crown & Bridge Material.” Accessed April 28, 2026. Https://parkell.com/SmarTemp-Provisional-Material
Rajput R, Hasti A, Choudhary A, Duggal S, Ali S. Comparative evaluation of flexural strength and surface roughness of three different commercially available provisional restorative material: an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2022;16(1):8-12. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51527.15830
Saati K, Khansari S, Farnaz Mahdisiar, Valizadeh S. Evaluation of microhardness of two bulk-fill composite resins compared to a conventional composite resin on surface and in different depths. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2022;23(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87669.1278
Takagi N, Ida Y, Iuchi T, et al. Effect of pre-polymerization temperature on the mechanical properties and viscosity of light-cure flowable composite resins for core build-up. Dent material J 2026; 45(1):105-11.https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2025-193
Abdelmaksoud OA, Hamdan HH, El-wasefy NA. The impact of storage temperature on the microhardness of composite restorative materials. International J Dent Med Sci Res 2022;4(2):403-5.) https://doi:10.35629/5252-0402403405
El-Maksoud OA, Hamama H, Wafaie RA, et al. Effect of shelf-storage temperature on degree of conversion and microhardness of composite restorative materials. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02770-0
Osternack FHR, Caldas DB, Rached RN, et al. Impact of refrigeration on the surface hardness of hybrid and microfilled composite resins. Braz Dent J 2009;20(1):42-7. https://doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000100007
Alomozainy M. Influence of storage temperature on vickers microhardness of resin composite. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci. 2018;3(2):70. https://doi.org/10.24105/aedj.2018.10.1
Zain AO, Piva E, Pimentel H, et al. Impact of storage conditions on the fracture reliability and physical properties of dental resin-based composite. Braz Oral Res 2024;15:38. https://doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024
Alharti R, Alqahtani AR, Alshehri AM, et al. Effect of Thermal Aging on Color Stability and Mechanical Properties of High-Density CAD/CAM Polymers Utilized for Provisional Restorations. J Funct Biomater 2025; 16(6):223. https://doi:10.3390/jfb16060223
Allorerung J, Anindita PS, Gunawan PN. Uji kekerasan resin komposit aktivasi sinar dengan berbagai jarak penyinaran. Jurnal e-GiGi. 2015;3(2):444-8. https://doi.org/10.35790/eg.3.2.2015.10010
Mohamadullah. Clinical Evaluation of Factors Leading to Provisional Crown Failure. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences 2014;2(6):3504-9. https://doi:10.36347/sjams.2014.v02i06.131
Haralur SB, Albarqi AT, Alamodi AG, et al. Comparison of various surface treatment procedures on the roughness and susceptibility to staining of provisional prosthodontic materials. J funct biomater 2024;15:1-15. https://doi: 10.3390/jfb15090256.
Alageel O, Alhijji S, Alsadon O, et al. Trueness, flexural strength and surface properties of various three dimensional (3D) printed interim restorative materials after accelerated aging. Polymers 2023;15(14):3040. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15143040
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkg.v28i1.60076
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran
All publications by the Universitas Padjadjaran [e-ISSN: 2549-6514, p-ISSN: 0854-6002] are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only.

.png)

