Email this article 
Penggunaan kata umpatan di Twitter berdasarkan gender di pilkada Sumatera Utara 2018
Abstract
Di dalam pandangan tradisional, perempuan distigmatisasi menjadi lemah lembut dan anggun. Oleh karena itu, sangat jarang kita melihat perempuan mengatakan kata kasar di ruang publik karena tabu bagi mereka. Media sosial menyediakan ruang virtual bagi orang untuk berinteraksi tanpa batas yang jelas. Orang-orang di Internet (netizen) dapat mengatakan hampir semuanya di media sosial tanpa memikirkan dampak negatif pada apa yang mereka katakan. Beberapa netizen melewati batas kesusilaan dengan mengucapkan kata kasar kepada netizen lain tanpa berpikir yang mungkin menyakiti seseorang. Studi terbaru menunjukkan bahwa kata-kata kasar dapat menyebabkan cyberbully yang pada akhirnya akan mengarah ke bunuh diri. Dengan demikian menggunakan kata kasar di media sosial mungkin memiliki dampak yang sama dengan menggunakannya dalam kehidupan nyata. Kemajuan media sosial telah menyebabkan penggunaannya dalam politik praktis. Kandidat politik menggunakan media sosial untuk mempromosikan profil mereka dan akhirnya mendapatkan pemilih. Sayangnya tidak semua dari mereka yang memposting komentar di media sosial beretika, termasuk perempuan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pemanfaatan Twitter dalam mengeluarkan kata umpatan berdasarkan perbedaan gender dalam pemilihan gubernur. Penelitian ini akan menganalisis Twitter sebagai platform media sosial paling umum yang digunakan dalam politik. Sebagai contoh, penelitian ini menangkap 5000 tweet dari pemilihan pilkada Sumatera Utara 2018 di Indonesia. Teknik statistik deskriptif digunakan dalam menganalisis data.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abril, E. P. (2016). Unmasking trolls: Political discussion on Twitter during the parliamentary election in Catalonia. Trípodos, 39, 53–69.
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election.
Aspinall, E., & Mas’ udi, W. (2017). The 2017 Pilkada (local elections) in Indonesia: Clientelism, programmatic politics and social networks. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 39(3), 417-426.
Barberá, P., & Rivero, G. (2015). Understanding the Political Representativeness of Twitter Users. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314558836
Bekir, H., Şahin, H., & Aydin, R. (2014). University students’ perception on woman’s place in a family. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.349
Bode, L. (2017). Closing the gap: Gender parity in political engagement on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1202302
Bode, L., & Dalrymple, K. E. (2016). Politics in 140 characters or less: Campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(4), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959686.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209939.
Demirhan, K., & Çakır-Demirhan, D. (2015). Gender and politics: Patriarchal discourse on social media. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 308–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.010.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation.
Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380–1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b.
Eagly, A. H., Eastwick, P. W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2009). Possible selves in marital roles: The impact of the anticipated division of labor on the mate preferences of women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208329696.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekma.n, A. B. (2000). Social role thoery of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (pp. 123–161). Retrieved from https://books.google.com/l=no&lr=&id=MFMwjXonRaYC&pgis=1
Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T., & Martinez, G. (2015). Countering online hate speech. UNESCO Series on Internet Freedom. https://doi.org/978-92-3-100105-5.
Gauthier, M., Guille, A., Rico, F., & Deseille, A. (2015). Text mining and Twitter to analyze British swearing habits. Proceedings of International Conference on Twitter for Research, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201200111.
Gruzd, A. (2016). Netlytic: Software for automated text and social network analysis. Diakses dari http://netlytic.org
Hardjaloka, L. (2015). Studi dinamika mekanisme pilkada di Indonesia dan perbandingan mekanisme pilkada negara lainnya. JurnalRechtsVinding. Vol 4 No.1 (59-83).
Jayachandran, S. (2015). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. The Annual Review of Economics, 7, 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115404.
Juditha, C. (2017). Hatespeech di media online: kasus pilkada DKI Jakarta 2017 hatespeech in online media: Jakarta on election 2017. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 21(2), 137–151.
Jungherr, A. (2014). Twitter in politics: A comprehensive literature review, 1–90.
Kasmani, M. F., Sabran, R., & Ramle, N. (2014). Can Twitter be an effective platform for political discourse in Malaysia? A sudy of #PRU13. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(October), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.304.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123.
McGregor, S. C., Lawrence, R. G., & Cardona, A. (2017). Personalization, gender, and social media: Gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information Communication and Society, 20(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228.
McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. 3A.E. Sharpe. https://doi.org/BB BWL 200 QQ 000 M169.
Metrotvnews.com. (2018). Perang medsos paling panas terjadi di pilgub Sumut. Diakses dari http://video.metrotvnews.com/special-event/GNlA1mVb-perang-medsos-paling-panas-terjadi-di-pilgub-sumut.
Neuman, W. L. (2016). Metodologi penelitian sosial: Pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Jakarta: Indeks.
Nugraha, F. (2017). Tokoh politik terhadap model pemilukada gubernur. Jurnal Civics, Vol 1, No1 (119-127).
Nulty, P., Theocharis, Y., Popa, S. A., Parnet, O., & Benoit, K. (2016). Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament. Electoral studies, 44, 429-444.
Öztürk, N., & Ayvaz, S. (2018). Sentiment analysis on Twitter: A text mining approach to the Syrian refugee crisis. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.006.
Parmelee, J. H., Roman, N., Beasley, B., & Perkins, S. C. (2019). Gender and generational differences in political reporters’ interactivity on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 232-247.
Preotiuc-Pietro, D., Carpenter, J., Giorgi, S., & Ungar, L. (2016). Studying the dark triad of personality through Twitter Behavior. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management - CIKM ’16 (pp. 761–770). https://doi.org/10.1145/2983323.2983822.
Putra, R. R. (2012). Bentuk dan fungsi kata umpatan pada komunikasi informal di kalangan siswa sma negeri 3 surabaya: kajian sosiolinguistik, 93–105.
Radsch, C. C., & Khamis, S. (2013). In their own voice: Technologically mediated empowerment and transformation among young Arab women. Feminist Media Studies, 13(5), 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2013.838378.
Rasywir, E., & Purwarianti, A. (2015). Eksperimen pada sistem klasifikasi berita hoax berbahasa Indonesia berbasis pembelajaran mesin. Jurnal Cybermatika, 3(2), 1–8. Retrieved from http://cybermatika.stei.itb.ac.id/ojs/index.php/cybermatika/article/view/133.
Rosidin, O. (2010). Kajian bentuk kategori dan sumber makian serta alasan penggunaannya oleh mahasiswa. Tesis, UI.
Senova, A. (2016). Literasi media sebagai strategi komunikasi tim sukses relawan pemenangan pemilihan presiden Jokowi JK di Bandung. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 4(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v4i2.
Shahheidari, S., Dong, H., & Daud, M. N. R. B. (2013, July). Twitter sentiment mining: A multi domain analysis. In 2013 Seventh International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (pp. 144-149). IEEE.
Wibowo, K. A., & Mirawati, I. (2013). Realitas politik Indonesia dalam kacamata pengguna Twitter. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 1/1, 11–17.
Williams, S. A., Terras, M. M., & Warwick, C. (2013). What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 384-410.
Zulfikar, W. B., Irfan, M., Alam, C. N., & Indra, M. (2017). The comparation of text mining with Naive Bayes classifier, nearest neighbor, and decision tree to detect Indonesian swear words on Twitter. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089231.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v7i1.18447
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Likha Sari Anggreni, Rino Ardhian Nugroho, Haniefira Safantyarizka Luthfi, Indriana Mega Kresna, Teguh Budi Santoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:
2.png){kind=small}
Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:
Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)
Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: jurnal.kajian.komunikasi@unpad.ac.id | jurnalkajiankomunikasiunpad@gmail.com
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by:
