Rise against rumors: Leveraging online social movements for hoax prevention by netizens

Rully Khairul Anwar, Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Edwin Rizal

Abstract


Background: Misinformation and harmful content spread on social media have sparked the anti-hoax movement. This research examines the motivations and participation of network users in combating hoaxes on digital platforms. Further investigation is required to examine the impact of framing, collective identity, and action factors on the propensity of netizens to actively engage in combating online hoaxes. Purpose: This study focused on framing, collective identity, and action components to explore the motivations behind netizens’ involvement in the anti-hoax movement on social media. Methods: In this study, web scraping, surveys, and netnographic techniques were employed to examine the motivations and trends of participation in the anti-hoax campaign. Data were collected from active members of MAFINDO on Facebook to facilitate this investigation. Results: Social media platforms, like those that MAFINDO uses, offer significant spaces for empowering and mobilizing communities to counteract false information and harmful content. The intentional construction of the anti-hoax movement, the establishment of a collective identity, and the alignment with the values of internet users were crucial elements in driving active engagement. The community employed efficacious tactics to counteract misinformation, such as verifying facts and presenting opposing viewpoints. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of social media platforms in resolving online problems. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the anti-hoax campaign hinges on factors like framing, collective identity, and agency that inspire internet users to engage and tackle the challenges of misinformation on social media. Implications: This study emphasizes how social media plays a key role in mobilizing internet users to fight hoaxes through effective framing, shared identity, and customized action factors.


Keywords


Digital literacy; hoax prevention; rumor, Mafindo; internet community

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anghel, R. G., Fauser, M., & Boccagni, P. (2019). Transnational return and social change: hierarchies, identities and ideas. Anthem Press.

APJII. (2022). Indonesia digital outloook 2022. In APJII. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII).

Barroso, P. (2022). From reality to the hyperreality of the simulation. Texto Livre, 15, e37426. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2022.37426

Bowler, G. (2014). Netnography: A Method Specifically Designed to Study Cultures and Communities Online. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1341

Buchanan, T. (2020). Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0239666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons.

Cheng, L. (2022). Media Arts as Political Advocacy in Hong Kong’s Social Movements. In Global Media Arts Education: Mapping Global Perspectives of Media Arts in Education (pp. 25–41). Springer.

Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2021). Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets. AI & SOCIETY, 36(4), 1105–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8

Donovan, J., & Boyd, D. (2021). Stop the presses? moving from strategic silence to strategic amplification in a networked media ecosystem. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878229

Elshahed, H. (2020). Social media mobilization and political activism in Egypt. Global Media Journal, 18(34), 1–8.

Gainous, J., Marlowe, A. D., & Wagner, K. M. (2013). Traditional Cleavages or a New World: Does Online Social Networking Bridge the Political Participation Divide? International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 26(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9130-2

Gamson, W. A. (2019). Talking politics. Cambridge.

Garrett, R. K. (2019). Social media’s contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213500

Geha, C. (2019). Politics of a garbage crisis: social networks, narratives, and frames of Lebanon’s 2015 protests and their aftermath. Social Movement Studies, 18(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1539665

Ghermandi, A., & Sinclair, M. (2019). Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. Global Environmental Change, 55, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003

Gillespie, T. (2022). Do not recommend? reduction as a form of content moderation. Social Media + Society, 8(3), 205630512211175. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221117552

Jacobson, T., & Garlic, N. (2021). Participatory communication in international context. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.955

Johns, A., & Cheong, N. (2019). Feeling the chill: bersih 2.0, state censorship, and “networked affect” on Malaysian social media 2012–2018. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 205630511882180. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118821801

Jokipalo, I., & Khudayarov, A. (2021). A Netnography and a Survey on Doping Use among Competitive Doping-untested Strength-sport Athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(07), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1342-7312

Khamainy, A. H., Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Detecting financial statement fraud through new fraud diamond model: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2021-0118

Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: redefined (2nd ed.). Sage.

Lebid, A., Nazarov, M., & Shevchenko, N. (2021). Information resilience and information security as indicators of the level of development of information and media literacy. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 6(2), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2021.2.354

Levitskaya, A., & Fedorov, A. (2020). Typology and mechanisms of media manipulation. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 5(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2020.1.69

Lin, Y., & Kant, S. (2021). Using social media for citizen participation: contexts, empowerment, and inclusion. Sustainability, 13(12), 6635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126635

Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F., & Valero, F. (2021). Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343

Lupien, P. (2020). Indigenous movements, collective action, and social media: new opportunities or threats? Social Media + Society, 6(2), 205630512092648. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926487

Meel, P., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2020). Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications, 153, 112986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112986

Meikle, G. (2016). Social media: Communication, sharing and visibility. In Social Media: Communication, Sharing and Visibility. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315884172

Messaoud, M. Ben. (2020). Social media networks and the democratic transition in Tunisia: from censorship to freedom. In Routledge Handbook on Arab Media (pp. 461–472). Routledge.

Millward, P., & Takhar, S. (2019). Social movements, collective action and activism. Sociology, 53(3), NP1–NP12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518817287

Misra, S. (2019). New media & social networks: a contemporary public sphere for social change. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 9(6), 324–334.

Moldovan, R. (2020). The social media revolution that failed: lessons from the Arab spring. Redefining Community in Intercultural Context, 9(1), 257–269.

Muqsith, M. A., Muzykant, V. L., & Kuzmenkova, K. E. (2019). Cyberprotest: new media and the new social movement in Indonesia. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 24(4), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2019-24-4-765-775

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. penguin UK.

Patihullah, J., & Winarko, E. (2019). Hate speech detection for indonesia tweets using word embedding and gated recurrent unit. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 13(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.40125

Regenberg, A. (2019). Science and social media. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 8(12), 1226–1229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0066

Servaes, J. (2020). Three types of communication research methods: quantitative, qualitative, and participatory. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change (pp. 533–554). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_112

Servaes, L., & Servaes, J. (2021). Participatory communication for social change. In Handbook of Communication and Development (pp. 120–141). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906356.00015

Shirky, C. (2019). Emojis are language too. The New York Times Book Review, 13–L.

Sinpeng, A. (2021). Hashtag activism: social media and the #FreeYouth protests in Thailand. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1882866

Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., Gupta, S., & Mahroof, K. (2020). Role of big data and social media analytics for business to business sustainability: a participatory web context. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.04.005

Sutan, A. J., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., & Salahudin, S. (2021). Using social media as tools of social movement and social protest in omnibus law of job creation bill policy-making process in Indonesia. In Advances in Digital Science: ICADS 2021 (pp. 261–274). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_24

Suwana, F. (2021). Content, changers, community and collaboration: Expanding digital media literacy initiatives. Media Practice and Education, 22(2), 153–170.

Sztompka, P. (2023). A much needed resource. In Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities (p. 175). SAGE.

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news.” Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

Toledano, M. (2017). Emergent methods: Using netnography in public relations research. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.007

Tufekci, Z. (2019). A response to Johanne Kübler’s a review of Zeynep Tufekci – twitter and tear gas: the power and fragility of networked protest (2017, New Haven: Yale University Press). International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 32(3), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-9317-2

Tufte, T., & Mefalopulos, P. (2009). Participatory communication: a practical guide (Vol. 170). World Bank Publications.

Turkle, S. (2020). A nascent robotics culture: new complicities for companionship. In Machine ethics and robot ethics (pp. 107–116). Routledge.

Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., Katz, J. E., & Miranda, J. P. (2019). The paradox of participation versus misinformation: social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701

Van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media & Society, 14614448211045662.

Volpi, F., & Clark, J. A. (2019). Activism in the Middle East and North Africa in times of upheaval: social networks’ actions and interactions. Social Movement Studies, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1538876

von Scheve, C. (2019). Social collectives. In Affective Societies (pp. 267–278). Routledge.

Vziatysheva, V. (2020). How fake news spreads online? International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 5(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2020.2.217

Wallis, R., & Buckingham, D. (2019). Media literacy: the UK’s undead cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1229314

Wiana, D. (2019). Analysis of the use of the hate speech on social media in the case of presidential election in 2019. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 3(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v3i2.1541

Yildirim, E. N. K. (2021). Digital media influencers’ commodification of social movements and human suffering. In Paradigm Shifts within the Communication World (pp. 299–319).

York, J. C., & Zuckerman, E. (2019). Moderating the public sphere. Human Rights in the Age of Platforms, 137, 143.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v11i2.49492

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Rully Khairul Anwar, Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Edwin Rizal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:

 

Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:

Faculty of Communication ScienceUniversitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)

Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: jurnal.kajian.komunikasi@unpad.ac.idjurnalkajiankomunikasiunpad@gmail.com


 site
stats View My Stats

Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by: