Hidden divide in literacy gap of muslim women from online gender based violence

Likha Sari Anggreni, Rika Lusri Virga, Yudie Aprianto, Olumayowa Adeleke Idowu

Abstract


Background: In the growth of the digital environment, women face structural vulnerabilities, especially in cases of Online Gender-Based Violence (OGBV) in Indonesia. Purpose: Many studies expose how skilled digital and technological mastery among top activists, but a significant gap remains in understanding how the digital divide impacts grassroots Muslim women’s safety. This research seeks to chart the digital gap among members of Nasyiatul ‘Aisyiyah in Yogyakarta and Fatayat NU in Kediri, to see how the gap affects OGBV prevention. Methods: The study adopted a qualitative semi-ethnographic approach, including in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis. The study adopted a qualitative semi-ethnographic approach involving in-depth interviews with three members of Aisyiah and Fatayat in Yogyakarta and Kediri. Data were also supplemented by observing their daily activities while accessing digital media and documenting their past activities. Results: The results revealed a hidden divide among less critical women in digital literacy and particularly technical security, as well as formal reporting systems, despite access through their devices. In addition, the culture within that society has influenced how women perceive and address online threats. Conclusion: The findings indicate that the digital divide is a structural problem and that it contributes to women’s ability to digitally defend themselves in times of crisis. Implications: In intellectual terms, these findings depict a complex picture of the tiptoeing line that lies in Islamic gender and communication discourses. In reality, the research implies that community-based literacy initiatives should consider integrating digital safety with religious morals. It also highlights the immediate imperative of multi-stakeholder cooperation among religious communities, state actors, and digital platforms to redress the silencing of women.


Keywords


Digital divide; digital safety; digital literacy; online gender-based violence; semi-ethnography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alauddin, M. B., Fitri, D., & Wenando, F. A. (2025). Tradition to technology: The transformation of indonesian culture in the social media era. Asian Journal of Media and Culture, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63919/ajmc.v1i1.16

Amaechi, K. E. (2024). A resource mobilisation study of how facebook enables gender-base violence in the online space in South Africa. Gender and Behaviour, 22(1), 22235–22248. https://doi.org/https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-genbeh_v22_n1_a8

Amaral, I., Basílio-Simões, R., & Poleac, G. (2022). Technology gap and other tensions in social support and legal procedures: stakeholders’ perceptions of online violence against women during the Covid-19 pandemic. El Profesional de La Información, 31(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.13

Anwar, R. K., Khadijah, U. L. S., & Rizal, E. (2023). Rise against rumors: Leveraging online social movements for hoax prevention by netizens. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 11(2), 268–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v11i2.49492

Aspinall, E. White, S., & Savirani, A. (2021). Women’s political representation in indonesia: who wins and how? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421989720

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS - Statistics Indonesia). (2023). Gender Inequality Index (GII) 2022. https://www.bps.go.id/en/pressrelease/2023/08/01/2042/gender-inequality-index--gii--2022.html

Barter, C., & Koulu, S. (2021). Digital technologies and gender-based violence–mechanisms for oppression, activism and recovery. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(3), 367–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16315286472556

Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/669608

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publications (Sixth Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc. All.

Duncan-Horner, E. M., Farrelly, M. A., & Rogers, B. C. (2022). Understanding the social entrepreneur: A new intentions model for advancing equity, social justice and sustainability. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(3), 361–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2020-0359

Faith, B. (2022). Tackling online gender-based violence; understanding gender, development, and the power relations of digital spaces. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2124600

Fitri, A., Triantoro, D. A., Nurrahmi, F., & Haekal, M. (2024). Digital literacy and islamic sharia values as a new perspective of preventing OGBV. Jurnal Komunikasi, 18(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol18.iss2.art2

George, A. S. (2024). Exploring the limitations of technology in ensuring women’s safety: A gender-inclusive design perspective. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 2(4), 19–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13621321

GSMA. (2019). The mobile gender gap report 2019.

Hicks, J. (2021). Global evidence on the prevalence and impact of online gender-based violence (OGBV).

Ibtasam, S., Razaq, L., Ayub, M., Webster, J. R., Ahmed, S. I., & Anderson, R. (2019). “My cousin bought the phone for me. I never go to mobile shops.” The Role of Family in Women’s Technological Inclusion in Islamic Culture. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/335914

Jaffe, R., & De Koning, A. (2022). Introducing urban anthropology. Routledge.

Jurriëns, E., & Tapsell, R. (2017). Challenges and opportunities of the digital ‘revolution’in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press

Khan, T., Perren, R., & Quintanilla, N. (2024). Voices against violence: Empowering students to address domestic terrorism through digital activism. Marketing Education Review, 34(4), 324–346.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2024.2421175

Kompas.com. (2026). Kekerasan seksual online terus meningkat, negara diminta perkuat perlindungan. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2026/04/20/07054871/kekerasan-seksual-online-terus-meningkat-negara-diminta-perkuat-perlindungan

Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152

Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359

Mahanani, P. A. R., Pratiwi, F. D., Ifriqia, F., & Sari, N. P. (2024). Mastering digital media literacy of muslim woman’s activists in preventing online gender-based violence. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v17i1.3097

Mikołajczyk, B. (2023). Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2131772

Monsees, L. (2025). Sticking around: Hobbyhorsing, digital transgression, and gender-based violence in TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube commentary. Feminist Media Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2540807.

Narayani, A. (2024). Women’s safety in digital space. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), 546–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561241271513

Nash, B. (2024). Critical inquiry in (and about) media environments: Examining an asset-based digital literacy curriculum. Journal of Literacy Research, 56(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X241244700

Novitzky, P., Janssen, J., & Kokkeler, B. (2023). A systematic review of ethical challenges and opportunities of addressing domestic violence with AI-technologies and online tools. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17140

Pardosi, P., Muttaqim, H., & Sugeng, I. S. (2024). Social Media Activism: The Rise of Digital Movements in the Global South. Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae, 1(6), 411–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70177/politicae.v1i6.1542

Ragnedda, M., & Gladkova, A. (2020). Understanding digital inequalities in the Global South. In Digital inequalities in the global south, 17–30. Springer.

Ross, J. N., Eastman, A., Laliberte, N., & Rawle, F. (2022). The power behind the screen: Educating competent technology users in the age of digitized inequality. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102014

Rowsell, J., Morrell, E., & Alvermann, D. E. (2017). Confronting the digital divide: Debunking brave new world discourses. The Reading Teacher, 71(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1603Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Roy, P., Raut, A., Samantaray, S., & Rana, A. (2024). Women and digital networking: digital skill gap and its challenges. 2024 International Conference on Advancements in Smart, Secure and Intelligent Computing (ASSIC), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ASSIC60049.2024.10507999

Scheibel, D. E. (2009). Qualitative, ethnographic, and performative approaches to communications in 21st century communication, a reference handbook. Sage Publication.

Sumartias, S., Koswara, A., Ahmad, J., & Restianty, A. (2024). Influencing factors of West Java higher education digital transformation. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 12(2), 300–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v12i2.58515

Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487

Wajcman, J. (2011). Gender and work: a technofeminist analysis. In Handbook of gender, work and organization, 263–275. Wiley‐Blackwell Maldon, MA and Oxford.

Wijaya, W. (2024). From mysticism to modernity: The evolution of kebatinan traditions In Indonesia. Journal of Humanities Research Sustainability, 1(6), 455–463. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.70177/jhrs.v1i6.1516

Zhong, J. (2025). Remedies of online gendered violence against women in the digital context. Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.61173/5c8sqg52.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v14i1.69199

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Likha Sari Anggreni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:

Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:

Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia

Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: [email protected]


site
stats View My Stats

Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by: