Democracy on Social Media: The Analysis of the New Criminal Code Ratification Polemic on Twitter

Ratih Anbarini; Aceng Abdullah; Nuryah Asri Sjafirah

doi:10.24198/jkj.v7i1.46588

Democracy on Social Media: The Analysis of the New Criminal Code Ratification Polemic on Twitter

Ratih Anbarini, Aceng Abdullah, Nuryah Asri Sjafirah

Abstract

The new Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana/KUHP) passage on December 6, 2022, sparked a significant conversation on Twitter, with pro and con responses making it a trending topic. Among these responses, certain influential actors disseminated messages that had the potential to shape public opinion, even if the information was not always accurate. This research utilizes social network theory to map the conversations surrounding netizens’ reactions to the new Criminal Code ratification on social media platforms. The study employs descriptive social network analysis methods to analyze three key variables: network structure, groups, and actors. Data was collected using NodeXL Pro between December 6 to December 10, 2022. The findings revealed that although the network consisted of 25,245 actors and 59,396 relationships, the level of interconnectivity among actors was relatively loose, indicating weaker and mostly one-way relationships. Furthermore, influential actors came from diverse backgrounds and profiles. This research confirms the ability of social media platforms to connect individuals without physical face-to-face interactions. At the group level, discussions regarding the new Criminal Code were divided into various topics, highlighting different perspectives and opinions. The presence of diverse actors reflects the inclusive nature of the network, exemplifying the concept of digital opinion movements and the emergence of digital public spaces. Although the public protests did not change the government’s decision, the conversations among netizens regarding the new Criminal Code raised public awareness of national issues, a crucial aspect of digital democracy.

Keywords

communication network; digital protest; netizen conversation; social network analysis; the new criminal code polemic

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, A., & Hidayat, D. R. (2018). Internet and prostitution activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012060

Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Segui, F. L., & Moreno-Sánchez, P. A. (2020). A social network analysis of tweets related to masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218235

Aisyah, P. N., Nusantara, G., & Sjafirah, N. A. (2022). Analisis jejaring sosial peran pers dalam penyebaran informasi terkait kebijakan PPKM. Jurnal Komunikasi Global, 11(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.24815/jkg.v11i1.24555

Ali, D. J., & Eriyanto. (2021). Political polarization and selective exposure of social media users in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 24(3), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.22146/JSP.58199

Arianto, B. (2017). Menakar peran relawan politik pasca kontestasi presidensial 2014. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 20(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.18000

Bakry, G. N., & Kusmayadi, I. M. (2021). Peran pers sebagai aktor gerakan digital tagar #SolidaritasUntukNTT di Twitter. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 5(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v5i1.33458

Barisione, M., & Ceron, A. (2017). A digital movement of opinion? Contesting Austerity through social media. In Social Media and European Politics (Issue June). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social network (J. Seaman (ed.)). SAGE Publications.

Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2260993

Borgatti, S. P., & Ofem, B. (2010). Overview: Social network theory and analysis. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), The Ties of Change: Social Network Theory and Application in Education (pp. 17–30). Harvard University Press.

Cahyaningrum, N. I., Fatima, D. W. Y., Kusuma, W. A., Ramadhani, S. A., Destanto, M. R., & Nooraeni, R. (2020). Analysis of user sentiment of Twitter to draft KUHP. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika Dan Komputasi, 16(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v16i3.8239

Carty, V. (2014). Arab spring in Tunisia and Egypt: The impact of new media on contemporary social movements and challenges for social movement theory. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 51(1), 51–80. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/sociology_articles/12/

Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1136/553

Dewantara, R. W., & Widhyharto, D. S. (2016). Aktivisme dan kesukarelawanan dalam media sosial Komunitas Kaum Muda Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 19(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10855

Diba, S. F. (2019). Implementasi metode Naive Bayes Classifier dalam analisis sentimen pada opini masyarakat terhadap RKUHP [Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/20258

Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. The MIT Press.

Eriyanto. (2021). Analisis jaringan media sosial: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasi metode jaringan sosial untuk membedah percakapan media sosial. Kencana.

Eriyanto. (2022). Analisis jaringan komunikasi: Strategi baru dalam penelitian ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Prenadamedia Grup.

Fuadi, A. (2020). Social media power for protest in Indonesia: The Yogyakarta’s #gejayanmemanggil case study. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 4(3), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v4i3.2438

Gaisbauer, F., Pournaki, A., Banisch, S., & Olbrich, E. (2021). Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 16(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249241

Hasna, S. (2022). Peran opinion leaders sebagai gatekeepers: Social network analysis penolakan RUU KUHP di Twitter #HidupMahasiswa 2019 [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/211308

Hwang, H., & Kim, K. O. (2015). Social media as a tool for social movements: The effect of social media use and social capital on intention to participate in social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 478–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12221

Ihsan, I. (2021). Sentiment analysis RKUHP pada Twitter menggunakan metode support vector machine. E-Proceeding of Engineering, 8(2), 3520–3536. https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/engineering/article/view/14735

Iosifidis, P., & Wheeler, M. (2015). The public sphere and network democracy: Social movements and political change? Global Media Journal, 13(25), 1–17. https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/the-public-sphere-and-network-democracy-social-movements-and-political-change.pdf

Juditha, C. (2016). Demokrasi di media sosial: Kasus polemik Rancangan Undang-Undang pemilihan kepala daerah. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31346/jpikom.v17i1.1354

Juniarto, D. (2016). Menyoal demokrasi digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Dialog Kebijakan Publik, 22, 28–35.

Medistiara, Y. (2022). Kejagung siap beri pendampingan hukum jika KUHP digugat ke MK. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6472228/kejagung-siap-beri-pendampingan-hukum-jika-kuhp-digugat-ke-mk

Meel, P., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2020). Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications, 153, 112986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112986

Neely, S. R., & Collins, M. (2018). Social media and crisis communications: A survey of local governments in Florida. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2016-0067

Neogi, A. S., Garg, K. A., Mishra, R. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Sentiment analysis and classification of Indian farmers’ protest using Twitter data. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100019

Nugraheny, D. E. (2022). KUHP hasil revisi tak langsung berlaku ada waktu 3 tahun untuk sosialisasi. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/12/07/10104931/kuhp-hasil-revisi-tak-langsung-berlaku-ada-waktu-3-tahun-untuk-sosialisasi

Olubunmi, A. P. (2015). The ambiguous power of social media: Hegemony or resistance ? New Media and Mass Communication, 33, 1–10. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/NMMC/article/view/19213

Papacharissi, Z., & Oliveira, M. de F. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x

Ramadhan, A., & Setuningsih, N. (2022). Mahfud MD tegaskan pasal penghinaan presiden bukan untuk lindungi Jokowi. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/12/15/16593941/mahfud-md-tegaskan-pasal-penghinaan-presiden-bukan-untuk-lindungi-jokowi

Ramadhani, A., & Arianto, I. D. (2022). Digital activism rancangan Undang-Undang tindak pidana kekerasan seksual. Jurnal PIKMA: Publikasi Media Dan Cinema, 5(1), 68–102. https://jurnal.amikom.ac.id/index.php/pikma/article/view/848

Rico, J. (2022). Indonesia patut bangga miliki KUHP sendiri. InfoPublik. https://www.infopublik.id/kategori/nasional-politik-hukum/691977/indonesia-patut-bangga-memiliki-kuhp-sendiri

Rizal, A. (2019). Pengguna Twitter di Indonesia paling banyak pria daripada perempuan. Grid.Id. https://infokomputer.grid.id/read/121705568/pengguna-twitter-di-indonesia-paling-banyak-pria-daripada-perempuan?page=all

Safitri, R., Alfira, N., Tamitiadini, D., Febriani, N. S., & Dewi, W. W. A. (2021). Analisis sentimen: Metode alternatif penelitian big data. UB Press.

Shafira, I. D., & Wibowo, E. A. (2022). Hari ini RKUHP disahkan, ini pasal yang masih jadi sorotan. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1664939/hari-ini-rkuhp-disahkan-ini-pasal-yang-masih-jadi-sorotan

Sitorus, A. M. H. (2022). Social Network Analysis (SNA) tentang protes digital di Twitter: Studi pada tagar #CabutPermenJHT56Tahun. Sosioglobal: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 7(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.24198/jsg.v7i1.38611

Smith, M. a, Rainie, L., Himelboim, I., & Shneiderman, B. (2014). Mapping Twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. The Pew Research Center, February 20, 1–57. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/

Sumartias, S., Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Sudarmono, S., Noorlistyo Adi, A., & Ratnasari, E. (2023). Democracy in the Indonesian digital public sphere: Social network analysis of Twitter users’ sesponses to the issue of nationalism knowledge test at the corruption eradication commission (TWK-KPK). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 26(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.70896

Susanto, E. H. (2017). Media sosial sebagai pendukung jaringan komunikasi politik. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i3.123

Sutan, A. J., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., & Salahudin, S. (2021). Using social media as tools of social movement and social protest in omnibus law of job creation bill policy-making process in Indonesia. In T. Antipova (Ed.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 261–274). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_24

Tang, Z., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Vo, H. (2015). Examining the role of social media in California’s drought risk management in 2014. Natural Hazards, 79(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1835-2

Utami, S. R., Safitri, R. N., & Kuncoroyakti, Y. A. (2021). Network analysis and actors #CancelOmnibusLaw on Twitter social media using Social Network Analysis (SNA). Journal of Media and Communication Science, 4(3), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcommsci.v4i3.111

Wukich, C. (2016). Government social media messages across disaster phases. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12119

Yahmin, Z. (2022). Bantah PBB, pemerintah tegaskan KUHP tidak bertentangan dengan HAM. RilisID. https://m.rilis.id/Nasional/Berita/Bantah-PBB-Pemerintah-Tegaskan-KUHP-Tidak-Bertentangan-dengan-HAM-jKT8ne9

Zempi, C. N., & Rahayu. (2019). Social media in the anticorruption movement: Social Network Analysis on the refusal of the “Koruptor Boleh Nyaleg” decision on Twitter. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v8i2.11195

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v7i1.46588

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Kajian Jurnalisme Indexed by:

Editorial Office of Kajian Jurnalisme:

Journalism Study Program, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran
Building 3 2nd Floor, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang KM.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang Regency, West Java 45363

Email: kajian.jurnalisme.fikom@unpad.ac.id
Telepon: (022) 7796954
Faks: (022) 7794122

<br />

Kajian Jurnalisme Supervised by:

View My Stats

Username
Password
Remember me