CLIMATE GEOPOLITICS AND INDO-PACIFIC RESILIENCE: STRATEGIC ADAPTATION IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT

Atika Puspita Marzaman, Darwis Darwis

Abstrak


This article examines how climate change has shifted from being framed primarily as an environmental problem to functioning as an instrument of power, diplomacy, and strategic influence among major powers in the Indo-Pacific region. The study adopts a qualitative comparative case study design based on structured, focused comparison of three cases, namely the United States, China, and the European Union. Each cases analysed through the same four analytical dimensions of climate geopolitics: policy instrument, material power base, institutional and normative channel, and effect on the strategic autonomy of recipient states. The findings show that the United States integrates climate resilience into its Indo-Pacific security architecture through humanitarian assistance and disaster diplomacy. In contrast, China leverages the Green Belt and Road Initiative to expand economic and technological influence, while the European Union exercises regulatory and normative power through the Global Gateway and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. The comparison shows that these three actors converge in treating climate cooperation as a channel of influence but diverge in the material base of that influence, namely logistical capacity, supply-chain and financing dominance, and market-regulatory reach. This divergence is best explained by comparative advantage rather than by three distinct designs for regional dominance. The article further distinguishes declared strategic intent, which is traceable in official documents, from geopolitical consequence, which may arise irrespective of intent, and therefore does not treat all climate cooperation as deliberate manipulation. These strategies address climate risks while simultaneously generating new dependencies and bargaining dynamics for Indo-Pacific states.


Kata Kunci


climate geopolitics; Indo-Pacific; climate resilience; great power competition; environmental diplomacy

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Ahmed, I., & McDonnell, T. (2020). Prospects and constraints of post-cyclone housing reconstruction in Vanuatu drawing from the experience of tropical cyclone Harold. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100126

AOSIS. (2024). Small Island States Leaders Affirm Statehood and Sovereignty Are Protected Against Sea Level Rise.

Barnett, J., & Adger, W. N. (2007). Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.03.003

Bryson, C., & Keener, V. W. (2024). Climate Finance in the Pacific: Opportunities and Challenges for Increasing Coordination and Collaboration in Green Climate Fund Projects. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, 9(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1163/24519391-090200004

Capie, D. (2015). The United States and Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) in East Asia: Connecting Coercive and Non-Coercive Uses of Military Power. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.1002914

Cheng, W. (2023). The green investment principles: from a nodal governance perspective. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 23(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09595-w

Dafermos, Y. (2025). Climate finance and global justice. Climate Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2482104

Dalby, S. (2013). The geopolitics of climate change. Political Geography, 37, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.09.004

Dalby, S. (2014). Rethinking Geopolitics: Climate Security in the Anthropocene. Global Policy, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12074

Delanova, M. O., & Fadillah, F. (2023). Strategi Pertahanan Amerika Serikat Dalam Merespons Ancaman Tiongkok Di Indo-Pasifik Pada Masa Kepemimpinan Joe Biden. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 382–409. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i2.472

ESCAP. (2023). Asia-Pacific Disaster Report 2023 Seizing the Moment Targeting Transformative Disaster Risk Resilience.

Eva Pander Maat. (2022). Leading by Example, Ideas or Coercion? The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Case of Hybrid EU Climate Leadership. European Papers, 7(1), 55–67.

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

Firdausy, C. M., Zuhdi, F., Rambe, K. R., Nugraheni, R. D., Erwidodo, & Azhahari, D. H. (2025). Readiness of the European trading countries toward carbon border adjustment mechanism: Evidence from Indonesia. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100597

Heldt, E. C. (2023). Europe’s Global Gateway: A New Instrument of Geopolitics. Politics and Governance, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7098

ICJ. (2025). PART IV (F): Sea-level rise in relation to international law - Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change.

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis.

Jazuli, M. R., Roll, K., & Mulugetta, Y. (2024). A review of Indonesia’s JETP through the dynamics of its policy regime. Global Policy, 15(5), 989–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13452

Kuik, C.-C. (2016). How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714

Kuik, C.-C. (2021). Getting hedging right: a small-state perspective. China International Strategy Review, 3(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5

Kumar, L., Jayasinghe, S., Gopalakrishnan, T., & Nunn, P. D. (2020). Climate Change and the Pacific Islands (pp. 1–31). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32878-8_1

Listianto, K. S. (2025). Indonesia’s Chairmanship of ASEAN 2023: Advancing Regional Collaboration on Environmental Diplomacy. Jurnal Studi Diplomasi Dan Keamanan, 17(1).

Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353

McDonald, M. (2013). Discourses of climate security. Political Geography, 33, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.002

Mikaelsson, M., Wibeck, V., & Linnér, B.-O. (2025). Navigating the waves of change: Framing Pacific Small Island Developing States within a geopolitical and climate context. Environmental Development, 56, 101270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101270

Mizo, R., & Hauger, J. S. (2025). Climate Change and Maritime Security: Challenges and Prospects for Cooperation for the Quad. Asia-Pacific Journal, 23, e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/apj.2025.10023

Munge, K. (2023). Climate Diplomacy and Geopolitics: Exploring the Role of Climate Policy in International Relations. Journal of Climate Policy, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.1546

Naqsabandiyah, A. H. (2025). Climate Adaptation Through Defense Diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific Region. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 19(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.19.2.2025.353-374

Otto, S. (2025a). The external impact of EU climate policy: political responses to the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 25(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-025-09667-z

Otto, S. (2025b). The external impact of EU climate policy: political responses to the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 25(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-025-09667-z

Sekiyama, T. (2022). Climate Security and Its Implications for East Asia. Climate, 10(7), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10070104

Sun, Y., & Yu, B. (2023). Greening China’s Belt and Road Initiative: From Norm Localization to Norm Subsidiarity? Global Environmental Politics, 23(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00685

The White House. (2025). The United States’ Enduring Commitment to the Indo-Pacific Region.

Vakulchuk, R., Overland, I., & Scholten, D. (2020). Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 122, 109547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109547

Wang, L., & Cheng, Z. (2024). Impact of the Belt and Road initiative on enterprise green transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 468, 143043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143043

Weatherill, K. C. (2023). Sinking Paradise? Climate change vulnerability and Pacific Island extinction narratives. Geoforum, 145, 103566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.04.011

Weiler, F., Klöck, C., & Dornan, M. (2018). Vulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, 104, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001

Wirdyansyah, D. M. (2025). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and Its Implications for Developing Economies: A Systematic Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Energy, 8(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.33116/ije.v8i2.292

WMO. (2023). State of the Climate in South-West Pacific 2022.

Zhang, D. (2022). China’s influence and local perceptions: the case of Pacific island countries. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 76(5), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2022.2112145




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/aliansi.v5i2.71603

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.




 Aliansi : Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional Terindeks Di:

Google Scholar  Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) WorldCat Indonesia One Search     

Penerbit:

Pusat Studi Politik dan Demokrasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran.

Kampus FISIP Universitas Padjadjaran, Gedung D, Lt.2 Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia