PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF D-LINE THREE STRAINS GRAND PARENT STOCK OF BROILER CHICKEN IN INDONESIA

Rosikin Rosikin; Rudi Afnan; Sri Darwati; Muladno Muladno

doi:10.24198/jit.v23i2.47209

PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF D-LINE THREE STRAINS GRAND PARENT STOCK OF BROILER CHICKEN IN INDONESIA

Rosikin Rosikin, Rudi Afnan, Sri Darwati, Muladno Muladno

Abstract

Production performance research was carried out on three Grand Parent Stock (GPS) broiler strains, namely Indian River, Ross and Cobb. The data was obtained from the results of production performance audits of broiler GPS breeders during the laying period of 25 – 65 weeks. Variables measured include laying lifeability, egg/hen house production, rate peak production/hen house, hatching egg/hen house production, fertility, hatchibilty, and saleable chick/henhouse. Data were analyzed quantitatively using t-test, analysis of variance (Anova) and Duncan. This study showed that the Indian river strain had higher production characteristics in terms of vitality, egg production, peak production, hatching egg production, and saleable chicks. Ross strains have higher production characteristics at rates of peak production, fertility, hatchability, and saleable chicks. The cobb strain has the lowest production performance compared to the other strains. Comparison between the strains and the principle standard shows that the actual hatchability and saleable chicks were lower than the standard in the Indian Rivers strain. The Ross strain had an actual value greater than the standard for fertility, hatchability and saleable chicks. Whereas the actual values for the Cobb strain for viability, egg production, peak production, hatching egg production, and saleable chicks were lower than the standard.

Keywords

grand parent stock, evaluation, performance, strain.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Bahouh ME, Al-Nasser AY, Abdullah FK, Ragheb G, Mashaly MM. (2012). Production kinerjance of different broiler breeds under different housing systems. International Journal Poultry Science. 11(3):190–195.doi:10.3923/IJPS.2012.190.195.

Al-Dawood AI, Al-Atiyat R. (2022). A Comparative Study on Growth Parameters of Three Broiler Chicken Strains from Jordan. Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Avicola 24(2):1–8.doi:10.1590/1806-9061-2021-1534.

Aviagen. (2016). ROSS 308 parent stock: performance objectives. Aviagen and the Aviagen, USA

Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health. (2018). Calculation of Planned Entry of Purebred Chicken Seeds and Planned Needs of Final Stock Doc Seeds for 2018. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health. (2019). Animal Husbandry and Health Statistics. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Hasan MK, Kabir MH, Sultana S, Hossen MA, dan Haq MM. (2016). Management and production performance of Cobb-500 broiler parent stock under open housing system. Asian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol, 1 (1), 66-72

Hiemstra SJ dan Napel JT. (2013). Study of the impact of genetic selection on the welfare of chickens bred and kept for meat production. Final report the project is implemented by IBF International consulting and Europe Union, Belgium

Hocking PM, McCorquodale CC. (2008). Similar improvements in reproductive kinerjance of male line, female line and parent stock broiler breeders genetically selected in the UK or in South America. British. Poultry Science. 49(3):282–289.doi:10.1080/00071660802129853.

Ministry of Agriculture. (2023). Decree of the Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30346/PK.230/F/02/2023 concerning the National Production Plan for Broiler and Egg-Laying Hens in 2023. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Van Marle-Köster E, Visser C. (2021). Unintended consequences of selection for increased production on the health and welfare of livestock. Archives Animal Breeding 64(1):177.doi:10.5194/AAB-64-177-2021.

Stanislaus S. (2009). Guidelines for data analysis with SPSS. Third Edition. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Strandén I, Kantanen J, Russo IRM, Orozco-terWengel P, Bruford MW. (2019). Genomic selection strategies for breeding adaptation and production in dairy cattle under climate change. Heredity (Edinb). 123(3):307.doi:10.1038/S41437-019-0207-1.

Sun Y, Fu L, Xue F, Li Y, Xu H, Chen J. (2019). Digital gene expression profiling and validation study highlight Cyclin F as an important regulator for sperm motility of chickens. Poultry Science 98(10):5118–5126.doi:10.3382/PS/PEZ212.

Tamalluddin F. (2012). Broiler Chicken, 22 Days of Harvest More Profit. Prasetya W B, editor. Bandung: Penebar Swadaya.

Ulmer-Franco AM, Fasenko GM, Christopher EEOD. 2010. Hatching egg characteristics, chick quality, and broiler kinerjance at 2 breeder flock ages and from 3 egg weights. Poultry Science 89(12):2735–2742.doi:10.3382/PS.2009-00403.

Zahid S, Hussain SA. 2002. Kinerjance of six commercial broiler strains reared under local environmental conditions. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 17(2):190–194.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jit.v23i2.47209

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

JURNAL ILMU TERNAK INDEXED BY:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Username
Password
Remember me