Preservation of Balinese batik knowledge as an effort to preserve indigenous knowledge

Miftahunnisa' Igiriza, Rahmat Alifin Valentino, Gunawan Wiradharma, Rahmat Fadhli, Zulham Adamy, Afifah Anjani

Abstract


Balinese batik, a traditional cloth, is rich in motifs and philosophical meanings that reflect the culture of the Balinese people and need to be preserved. Preservation efforts aim to ensure that the knowledge contained in Balinese batik can be sustainable in the long term. This study examined the knowledge and preservation of Balinese batik cloth to preserve indigenous knowledge. This study used a qualitative method by analyzing the knowledge contained in Balinese batik cloth using Peirce's semiotic approach and a case study to explore the preservation efforts carried out by the UPTD Bali Museum. The data collection technique used interview and observation methods, which were conducted from May to June 2024. Data analysis was carried out through data reduction, data presentation (data display), and conclusion. Study results showed that if examined more deeply, Balinese batik contained philosophical meanings that reflected the culture of Balinese society due to the influence of Hinduism and local values. Balinese batik motifs were also inseparable from the influence of Chinese cultural elements that contain spiritual and mythological values. The Bali Museum conducted preservation efforts through processes such as identifying and validating knowledge in local communities and academic circles, recording and storing this knowledge in a database, and disseminating it to the broader community. This study concludes that Peirce's semiotics can assist in identifying the indigenous knowledge of Balinese batik, and in this case, the Bali Museum plays an important role in preserving local wisdom.


Keywords


Balinese batik; Semiotics; Meaning; Knowledge preservation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, A. A., Othman, N., & Ab. Halim, A. (2022). Indigenous knowledge documentation: Perspectives of Dusun and Bajau Communities in Kota Belud, Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/15205

Adebiyi, R. A. (2015). Communicating indigenous knowledge through exogenous channel: A comparative content analysis of adelakun’s under the brown rusted roofs and achebe’s things fall apart. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 12, 1–12. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JCSD/article/view/26510

Akbar, A., & Astuti, K. S. (2022). Decoding the significance of pepongoten music: A peircean semiotics analysis Azhari. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU), 10(4), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i4.4499

Alamineh, G. A., Hussein, J. W., Mulu, Y. E., & Taddesse, B. (2023). The negative cultural impact of tourism and its implication on sustainable development in Amhara Regional State. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2224597

Amboro, J. L. (2022). Visualisasi arjuna, naga, dan ornamen dalam karya seni kerajinan keramik yang memuat unsur kebudayaan. Imajinasi: Jurnal Seni, 16(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15294/imajinasi.v16i2.41721

Aryani, S., & Yuwita, M. R. (2023). Analisis semiotika Charles Sanders Peirce pada simbol rambu lalu lintas Dead End. Mahadaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 3(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.34010/mhd.v3i1.7886

Basiroen, V. J. (2019). The acculturation of batik lasem culture with Chinese motif in the 18th to 20th century. Lekesan: Interdisciplinary Journal of Asia Pacific Arts, 2(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.31091/lekesan.v2i2.890

Chigwada, J., & Ngulube, P. (2023). Stakeholders in the acquisition, preservation, and dissemination of indigenous knowledge projects. Information Development, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231192851

Darmaputri, G. L. (2015). Representasi identitas kultural dalam simbol-simbol pada batik tradisional dan kontemporer. Commonline Departemen Komunikasi, 4(2), 45–55. https://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-comme47cb0d25bfull.pdf

Deepshikha, Yammiyavar, P., & Nath, N. (2018). Textiles as communicating links for cultural traditions. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2018 (pp. 168–177). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_19

Ford, L. P. (2020). The indigenous Australian knowledge traditions: New ways for old ceremonies – A case study of Aboriginal final mortuary ceremonial practices in the Northern Territory. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 16(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2020.16.2.2

Haddad, N. A., Fakhoury, L. A., & Sakr, Y. M. (2021). A critical anthology of international charters, conventions & principles on documentation of cultural heritage for conservation, monitoring & management. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 21(1), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4575718

Hardiman. (2018). Pameran qilin: Membaca kisah Tionghoa-Singaraja dalam karya rupa. Tatkala.Co. https://tatkala.co/2016/10/26/pameran-qilin-membaca-kisah-tionghoa-singaraja-dalam-karya-rupa/

Hibatullah, F. (2019). Kajian motif kain cual khas Bangka Belitung. Serupa: Jurnal Pendidikan Seni Rupa, 8(1), 72–83. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/serupa/article/view/14855

Hudah, K. (2023). Batik Tionghoa. Batikprabuseno.Com. https://www.batikprabuseno.com/artikel/edukasi/batik-tionghoa/

Info Batik. (2020). Peradaban batik lasem di Indonesia. Infobatik.Com. https://www.infobatik.com/peradaban-batik-lasem-di-indonesia/

Jagielska-Burduk, A., Pszczyński, M., & Stec, P. (2021). Cultural heritage education in UNESCO cultural conventions. Sustainability, 13(6), 3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063548

Jahangeer, Abdurraheem, & Ansari, M. N. (2021). Role of museums in education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 3(2), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-863

Javapitu. (2024). Batik tulis cap tradisional - peony black. Javapitu.Com. https://javapitu.com/products/batik-tulis-cap-tradisional-peony-black-javapituhttps://javapitu.com/products/batik-tulis-cap-tradisional-peony-black-javapitu

Jebur, A. K. (2022). The techniques of cultural heritage: Literature review. Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering, 6(4), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjce.2022.v06i04.006

Kapil, D. (2023). Techniques of preserving the rich cultural heritage managed by digitization. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 377–284. https://doi.org/10.52783/tojqi.v11i1.9970

Kristiyanto, E. N. (2017). Kedudukan kearifan lokal dan peranan masyarakat dalam penataan ruang di daerah. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i2.172

Lukman, C. C., Setyoningrum, Y., & Rismantojo, S. (2018). Indonesian Chinese visual language of “qilin” on lasem batik ancestral altar cloth (Tok wi). Journal of Arts & Humanities, 07(09), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i9.1488

Magni, G. (2017). Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12238

Maisyaroh, I., & Oktavia, S. (2019). Griya Boedaya: Komoditas wahana berliterasi budaya sebagai wujud pengenalan budaya lokal di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 7(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v7i1.19428

Maraña, E. C., Arpon, R. A. A., Capuchino, I. L. L., Casiño, R. A. F., Casuga, K. R. T., & Aguilar, J. G. (2023). Strengthening of best practices in the preservation of cultural diversities: A phenomenological research. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 15(3), 046–062. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2023.15.3.0166

Mohan, U. (2019). The power of fabrication: Reflections on curating Balinese textiles. The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief, 15(2), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17432200.2019.1572355

Museum Ranggawarsita. (2020). Batik tokwi motif kilin dan burung hong. Pameran Bersama Virtual. https://pameranvirtual.ranggawarsitamuseum.id/pameran/MUSEUM_RANGGAWARSITA/205

Pangestuti, M. (2021). Analisis semiotika Charles S. Pierce pada poster street harassment karya Shirley. Konfiks: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajaran, 8(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.26618/konfiks.v8i1.4783

Peirce, C. S. (2014). Peirce on signs (J. Hopes (ed.)). The University of North Carolina Press.

Poon, S. (2020). Symbolic resistance: Tradition in batik transitions sustain beauty, cultural heritage and status in the era of modernity. World Journal of Social Science, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjss.v7n2p1

Putri, H. N., & Desriyeni. (2023). Preservasi pengetahuan kegiatan tamaik kaji dalam budaya pernikahan di kota Pariaman, Sumatera Barat. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi), 8(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v8i1.15527

Ramadani, F., Purnawati, D. M. O., & Pageh, I. M. (2020). Etnis sasak di Banjar Bukit Tabuan Desa Bukit, Karangasem, Bali (Sejarah, kerukunan, dan pengintegrasian sebagai sumber belajar sejarah di SMA). Widya Winayata: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjps.v8i3.29507

Ristanto, R. H., Suryanda, A., Rismayati, A. I., Rimadana, A., & Datau, R. (2020). Etnobotani: Tumbuhan ritual keagamaan Hindu-Bali. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 5(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.642

Rozin, V. M. (2020). Culture and man in the mirror of semiotic-environmental approach. Nota Bene, 10, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2020.10.34037

Salmin, A. K. (2021). Recognition as a phenomenon of ethnic identity. Vestnik Chuvashskogo Universiteta, 2, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.47026/1810-1909-2021-2-181-188

Salvi, R. (2020). The process of knowledge dissemination. Lingue e Linguaggi, 34, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v34p15

Senoprabowo, A., Prabowo, D. P., & Khamadi, K. (2023). Digitalisasi ornamen kala, mentari, dan merak sebagai inovasi motif batik. Jurnal Desain, 10(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.30998/jd.v10i2.14284

Sharma, A. K. (2014). Indigenous knowledge communication in the 21st century. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 4(1), 128–135. http://www.ijodls.in/uploads/3/6/0/3/3603729/ajay_kum_sharma_128-135.pdf

Titu, S. V. (2023). Menarik, sejarah batik lasem di Jawa Tengah, ternyata ada pengaruh negara asing. Pos Flores. https://www.posflores.com/lifestyle/4419480695/menarik-sejarah-batik-lasem-di-jawa-tengah-ternyata-ada-pengaruh-negara-asing

Torop, P. (2017). Semiotics of cultural history. Sign Systems Studies, 45(3–4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2017.45.3-4.07

Trixie, A. A. (2020). Filosofi motif batik sebagai identitas bangsa Indonesia. Folio, 1(1), 1–9. https://journal.uc.ac.id/index.php/FOLIO/article/view/1380/1148

Wahid, W. A., & Isa, M. J. M. (2022). Museum as a laboratory of knowledge towards local culture empowerment. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI7.3793

Wang, Y. (2022). Research on the strategy of cultural education propaganda in museums—Taking Hubei Provincial museum as an wxample. Advances in Education, 12(12), 5095–5104. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2022.1212774

Whyte, K. (2018). What do indigenous knowledges do for indigenous peoples? In Traditional Ecological Knowledge (pp. 57–82). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108552998.005

Widayat, R. (2022). Dragon ornaments in the contexts of batik cloth, and the cultures of Javanese and Tionghoa in Indonesia. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 37(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v37i3.2017

Yuan’, M. (2023). The imaginary beast-the phoenix sign as the bearer of the Chinese bestial cultural code: The evolution of meanings. Culture and Art, 1, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2023.1.39617

Zhang, K., Kistamah, N., & Fu, M. (2021). Aesthetic features of peony pattern in Chinese silk in the song dynasty. Journal of Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering, 9(11), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37532/jftte.2021.9(11).230

Zhang, X., & Sheng, J. (2017). A Peircean semiotic interpretation of a social sign. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.04.002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v12i2.58663

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan Indexed by:

 

 

Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan
Program Studi Perpustakaan dan Sains Informasi d.h. Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan
Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia 45363
WA: +62 877-1860-4022 (Risa Nurisani)

Telepon: +62227796954
Faksimile: +62227794122
email: jkip.fikom@unpad.ac.id

 



Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan supervised by: